Is Human and Organizational Performance (HOP) Compatible with Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA)?

With the rise of “New View” approaches like Human and Organizational Performance (HOP), there have been increased conversations about the applicability of the science of behavior and behavior-based safety (BBS) to HOP. Many pioneers and proponents of HOP have even gone to social media and beyond to claim an incompatibility with BBS. I’ve personally been brought into many of these conversations online, at conferences, and even at client sites by senior leaders. Now I recognize that everyone has their own perspectives and interpretations of approaches like HOP, BBS, and others, some accurate, some informed, and some not. But we’re all working toward a common goal – helping keep people safe. For this reason, I wanted to offer some opening points of clarification in case you happen to engage in these conversations or if you would like to work together with me on collaborations across these spaces.

Regardless of what safety philosophy you’re working under, all behavior arises in response to some prompting event—such as training, signage, reminders, or intrinsic/extrinsic motivators. Behavior persists or stops based on its outcomes, good or bad, from the individual’s perspective. Simply put, people behave in ways that work for them—that’s a foundational principle of science.

You cannot achieve results without behavior, meaning you cannot operate effectively while being "anti-behavior-based." However, you can oppose BBS or what you believe BBS to be based on past experiences. If at-risk behaviors occur, performance diagnostics and root cause analyses are essential—they’re a core component of behavioral safety. Without these practices, it’s not behavioral safety.

At its foundation, behavioral safety is about setting workers up for success and providing them with meaningful support. This cannot be achieved by focusing solely on one level of an organization. If you’ve encountered conflicting definitions of BBS or behavior change, then what you’ve seen likely wasn’t true behavioral safety. That’s not a matter of opinion—it’s backed by decades of scientific research. Let’s work together and keep the conversation going.

Posted by Nic Weatherly, Ph.D.

Dr. Weatherly is the CEO and Managing Consultant at Deliberate Coaching International with a proven track record of maximizing operating revenues and organizational and staff performance by building holistic systems and targeted training programs, linking performance-improvement initiatives to key business metrics, and strategically aligning short- and long-range goals to the organization’s mission, vision, and values.

Nic Weatherly, Ph.D.

Dr. Nicholas Weatherly is the CEO and Managing Consultant at Deliberate Coaching International. He is an experienced executive, leadership coach, researcher, and author with over 20 years of success leading progressive people operations, transforming industrial safety cultures, and maximizing performance in numerous industries including manufacturing, energy, banking, call centers, transportation, education, and healthcare. He and his teams have worked with hundreds of organizations across the world, with a proven track record of maximizing operating revenues and organizational and staff performance by building holistic systems and targeted training programs, linking performance-improvement initiatives to key business metrics, and strategically aligning short- and long-range goals to the organization’s mission, vision, and values.

Dr. Weatherly’s achievements in operational excellence come through translating organizational capability and objectives into innovative organization-wide initiatives that maximize growth potential through monitoring KPIs, implementing science-based practices, collaborating with individuals across all levels of an organization toward a shared goal, working with inter-disciplinary teams that foster diverse experiences and perspectives, and establishing results-focused objectives and timetables. He has a proven record of forecasting needs and scaling programs in fast-paced environments as market demand necessitates without sacrificing ethics or integrity.

An experienced researcher and sought-after international speaker, Dr. Weatherly holds a faculty appointment at Florida Southern College, maintains a line of research on leadership and coaching through Endicott College, and has served as the Head of the School of Behavior Analysis at the Florida Institute of Technology.

Dr. Weatherly has held advisory roles and served on the board of directors for a number of professional associations, advocacy groups, and service facilities including the New York State Association for Behavior Analysis, the Minnesota Northland Association for Behavior Analysis, and the Autism Treatment Association of Minnesota. He is the Past-President of the Association of Professional Behavior Analysts and is also Past-President of both the Georgia Association for Behavior Analysis and the Kentucky Association for Behavior Analysis. He has also worked with the Behavior Analyst Certification Board® across numerous areas including serving as a member of the BACB® Disciplinary Review Committee, as a Code Section Specialist for the BACB’s Code Compliance Committee, as a coach trainer and mentor, and in the development of an ethics coaching system. Dr. Weatherly was the inaugural chair of the Kentucky Applied Behavior Analyst Licensing Board, one of the first stand-alone licensing boards for behavior analysis in the country, and continues to stay active in public policy efforts.

Dr. Weatherly received his Ph.D. from Western Michigan University’s Applied Behavior Analysis Program with concentrations on behavioral systems analysis, behavior-based safety, and programmed instruction. He currently serves on the Editorial Board of the Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, is the co-author of three books on Deliberate Coaching, and is a Board Certified Behavior Analyst-Doctoral®.

https://www.deliberatecoaching.org/drweatherly
Previous
Previous

There’s No Such Thing as Constructive Criticism